Legal Opinion

National Bank of the Republic of Chicago v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 10, 1933No. 4861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The sole question presented is whether under the circumstances stated, decedent’s real estate in Illinois was rightly included in his gross estate. The determination of this question involves an interpretation of section 302 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1924, c. 234, 43 Stat. 253 (26 USCA § 1094 note),1 and chapter 3, §§ 99,108 of Smith-Hurd Rev. St. Ill. 1931, chapter 3, pars. 99 and 108, of Cahill’s Illinois Revised Statutes (1931).2

The conditions expressed in clause (a), supra, are to the effect that the taxable estate must be (1) an interest of the decedent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. First Trust Co. of Omaha v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bretzfelder v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API