Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Matter of Guardianship of Larson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. NonePublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAmundson, Justice

[¶ 39.] I respectfully dissent as to some of the expenses approved by the majority.

[¶40.] As a preliminary matter, the controlling statutory law must be identified. The majority applies SDCL 30-23-1 through 30-23-3 as well as SDCL 30-26-3 and 30-25-28 to this guardianship accounting. However, on July 1, 1993, the prior law was repealed and replaced by SDCL ch 29A-5, the current South Dakota Guardianship and Con-servatorship Act. Although the new law specified that it would not have retroactive application to guardianship accountings, SDCL 29A-5-103, that does not mean that account-ings for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of Guardianship of RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Green v. LombardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Lesnick v. LesnickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. In Re Georgea Kosmadakes, Adult Ward, Julia K. Maghan, James A. Crooks, Successor, Conservator, and Auditor of the CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API