Legal Opinion

Home Ins. Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 12, 1935No. 8 Div. 610PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action on a fire insurance policy. Defendant pleaded in abatement that plaintiff had not complied with the policy requirements as to proofs of loss. To that plea plaintiff replied. In No. 2, to which demurrer was overruled, he alleged in substance that a few days after the fire a certain named agent of defendant had “authority to solicit and receive applications for fire insurance, to issue and countersign policies of fire insurance and to collect premiums thereon, all for the ’defendant, who countersigned the policy sued on, and while acting for defendant and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Alabama State Mutual Assurance Co. v. Long Clothing & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Continental Insurance v. ParkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Continental Fire Ins. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mutual Service Insurance v. Frit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Bruins v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Yannuzzi v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Royal Ins. Co. v. StoryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API