Legal Opinion

Locke v. County Court of Raleigh County

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1931No. Nos. 7173, 7174PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Relators, Locke and Butts, assert that they are de jure and de facto probation officers of the county of Raleigh and by these mandamus proceedings seek to compel the county court of that county to pay their respective salaries now in arrear. The county court replies that Kyle D. Harper and. T. C. Gla-shen were appointed probation officers for that county on the 31st day of January, 1929, and November 30, 1929, respectively, by the judge of the circuit court and that the last two named persons claim to be the probation officers under that appointment, and that a doubt has arisen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. ShallcrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ex parte McNeeleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Robinson v. Charleston Interurban RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Paul B. v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Rose L. v. PancakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Robertson v. WarthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API