Legal Opinion

McKay v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1939No. 27498, 27499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

It is clear from the allegations of the original petition that the pleader was attempting to set out a cause of action *218on the theory that the defendant had harmed the plaintiff by violating his right to be furnished in the switch-yard a properly designed, located, and constructed side-track as to grade, elevation, and curve; that the side-track had too sharp a curve and too steep an incline, and that this condition caused a flat car, on which the plaintiff was riding in discharge of his duties, to be derailed, and that this alleged negligence on the part of the defendant was the proximate…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Davis v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API