Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fraser v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2001No. 1999-SC-0846-DGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KELLER, Justice, Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part.

I agree with much of Section II of the majority opinion and would remand this matter for the trial court to appoint counsel for Appellant and to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing in Appellant’s underlying *459RCr 11.42 action. I write separately, however, because I adamantly disagree with the majority’s Section I conclusion regarding a needy person’s right to appointed counsel in RCr 11.42 proceedings. Accordingly, I would modify the majority’s Section II holding and, in addition to remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. ReneerKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fraser v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bradshaw v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  5. Warner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API