Fraser v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KELLER, Justice, Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part.
I agree with much of Section II of the majority opinion and would remand this matter for the trial court to appoint counsel for Appellant and to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing in Appellant’s underlying *459RCr 11.42 action. I write separately, however, because I adamantly disagree with the majority’s Section I conclusion regarding a needy person’s right to appointed counsel in RCr 11.42 proceedings. Accordingly, I would modify the majority’s Section II holding and, in addition to remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commonwealth v. ReneerKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Fraser v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Bradshaw v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Warner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.