Legal Opinion · Dissent

Craig v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 4, 2003No. SC 16608Published

1Dissent

SULLIVAN, C. J., with whom ZARELLA, J.,

joins, dissenting. Today the majority both overrules a case directly on point that properly had concluded that the Dram Shop Act (act) preempts the common law, and overrules more than 100 years of common-law precedent in creating a new cause of action for the negligent sale of alcohol. By doing so, the majority eviscerates a scheme of recovery that the legislature carefully had crafted in reliance upon these very long-standing, but now abandoned, common-law precedents. Because I believe, as this court has twice previously stated, that “[i]f the damage…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Kowal v. HofherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Nolan v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API