Durse v. Henn

George Durse appeals the final judgment in favor of the appellee, Janice Henn, after the jury found Henn not liable for injuries Durse sustained following a car accident. Durse argues two points on ap peal: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding causation from the investigating officer, Officer Car-mack; and (2) that the trial court erred when it refused to allow Durse to present the full amount of his past medical bills to the jury. We agree with Durse on both points and reverse.

Durse was a passenger in a vehicle driven by Cushman (the Durse vehicle). While the Durse…