Legal Opinion

Boston Fish Market Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 29, 1972No. Docket No. 6054-70Published

Upon termination of various leases of certain of its property, petitioner received a cash payment of $ 47,500 in settlement of the tenant's obligation, under the controlling agreements, to restore leasehold improvements on the premises to their original, prelease condition. Held, such a cash payment is not excludable from gross income under sec. 109, I.R.C. 1954, and is taxable as capital gain to to the extent that it exceeds the basis of the leasehold improvements.

1Opinion of the Court

Boston Fish Market Corporation, Fulham and Maloney, Inc., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Boston Fish Market Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6054-70

United States Tax Court

57 T.C. 884; 1972 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 154;

March 29, 1972, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Upon termination of various leases of certain of its property, petitioner received a cash payment of $ 47,500 in settlement of the tenant's obligation, under the controlling agreements, to restore leasehold improvements on the premises to their original, prelease condition. Held, such a cash payment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. BruunSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Waggoner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  3. Tobias v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. Washington Fireproof Bldg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. Boston Fish Market Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API