Legal Opinion
Krause v. Hullar
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, Official Referee.
The action arises out of the following facts: On February 3, 1915, one Joseph Hullar, father of the plaintiff, and Emma L. Hullar, his wife (since deceased), executed and delivered to the plaintiff a bond and mortgage to secure the payment of the principal sum of $1,000 in three years from the date thereof and interest payable semi-annually, at five per cent, which said mortgage was recorded in Onondaga county clerk’s office on February 2, 1916.
The plaintiff testifies that she advanced the money to her father at the time and has placed in evidence Exhibit 3, her check…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Groesbeck v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ten Eyck v. . WitbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Larned v. . DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Davies v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joazard v. JoazardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011