Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Wolf
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1929No. 21914. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
In October, 1927, the Een Eeal Estate Exchange sold and conveyed to one Theodore Wolf a lot located in the Latona addition to Seattle. The purchase price of the property was $1,200, of which $200 was paid in cash and $1,000 in notes secured by a mortgage. The purchase money mortgage contained the following clause:
“Consent is hereby given to the placing of a new mortgage on said premises in as large a sum as a reliable mortgage company will place thereon, the same to be a first mortgage, to which this mortgage will be subject, provided that at said time this mortgage and the note secured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malmgren v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Sturgis v. GalindoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Ohio Savings Assn. v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Silvey v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Miller v. StoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McConnell v. Mortgage Investment Co. of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- McConnell v. Mortgage Investment Co. of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1957