Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Wolf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1929No. 21914. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

In October, 1927, the Een Eeal Estate Exchange sold and conveyed to one Theodore Wolf a lot located in the Latona addition to Seattle. The purchase price of the property was $1,200, of which $200 was paid in cash and $1,000 in notes secured by a mortgage. The purchase money mortgage contained the following clause:

“Consent is hereby given to the placing of a new mortgage on said premises in as large a sum as a reliable mortgage company will place thereon, the same to be a first mortgage, to which this mortgage will be subject, provided that at said time this mortgage and the note secured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malmgren v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Sturgis v. GalindoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ohio Savings Assn. v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Silvey v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Miller v. StoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Mortgage Investment Co. of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McConnell v. Mortgage Investment Co. of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API