Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. v. SGS Petroleum Service Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAZEN, District Judge:
An insurer sought a declaratory judgment that it was not required to show prejudice before denying coverage for liability arising out of a pollution occurrence which the insured did not report within thirty days, as required by a pollution buyback clause in the policy. The district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment. We AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
This diversity case involves a dispute over insurance coverage between Plaintiff-Appellee Starr Indemnity & Liability Company (“Starr”), a Texas-based…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Doe v. MySpace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Conn Credit I, L.P. v. TF Loanco III, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- PetroSantander (USA), Inc. v. HDI Global Ins. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Advanced Seismic Tech., Inc. v. M/V FortitudeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Brit UW Limited v. Atwood Properties, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.