State v. Plym
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order, of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Mitchell, J.1
The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the erime of bigamy. The case comes here on a bill of exceptions which does not purport to contain all the evidence. The rulings of court in admitting certain evidence, and in certain parts of its charge to the jury, are here assigned as error. The state introduced evidence sufficient to prove the defendant’s first marriage, in Sweden, *386in July, 1876, and his second marriage, in St. Paul, on the 10th of January, 1889. The uncontroverted evidence was that the defendant left Sweden and came to the United States in April, 1884,…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Turner v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Weidlich v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Goodier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.