Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Hoopman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1988No. Cr. 870333PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether or not the City of Bismarck (City) may appeal to county court from a municipal court’s memorandum decision dismissing the City’s complaint against Wesley Hoopman. Hoopman was arrested for being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Bismarck City Ordinance 12-10-01.

The City appealed from the dismissal of the complaint against Hoopman to Burleigh County Court. The Burleigh County Court dismissed the City’s appeal after concluding the City had no authority to appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JelliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GelvinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. NovakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Minot v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Bismarck v. UhdenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Grand Forks v. CameronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. STATE, EX REL. HARRIS v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. City of Dickinson v. KraftNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API