Legal Opinion

Nieratko v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 28, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01112Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD EGAN NIERATKO and WINDY Case No. 21-cv-01112-BAS-BGS RENEE NIERATKO, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, 13 REMAND (ECF No. 9) v. 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs Chad Nieratko and Windy Nieratko bring a Motion to Remand this action 18 to state court. (ECF No. 9.) On June 14, 2021, Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) 19 removed this matter to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs 20 contest removal arguing Ford did not adequately prove diversity…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API