Legal Opinion

State v. Schook

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, Ch. J.

The defendant was arrested on a forgery charge. He was taken before a magistrate for preliminary examination. He demanded that the testimony taken he reduced to writing. Thereafter he stipulated with the state

“That the proceedings in this preliminary hearing be taken down in shorthand . . . and that upon request of either party they shall be transcribed. . . .”

The hearing proceeded. Witnesses were examined. The testimony was taken down in shorthand in accordance with the stipulation. The magistrate bound the defendant over to the next term of the district court. Subsequently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. GottliebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. RudolphNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. FradetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API