Legal Opinion

Muscolino v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1959No. Civ. 23951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

Petitioners seek a writ • of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding with the trial of an action in eminent domain.

By the subject action the county of Los Angeles seeks to condemn for public highway and park purposes an easement 12 feet in width over certain lands owned by petitioners; that strip of land to be a part of riding and hiking trails (29) and (72) from which by ordinance all motor vehicles will be excluded. The land of petitioners over which the easement is sought lies within the boundaries of the Los Angeles County Flood Control channel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. County of ShastaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Simon v. PettitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Simon v. PettitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API