Legal Opinion

Vietor v. Sill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 1975No. 74-394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On the occasion of the third appearance of this case no useful purpose will be served by any further recitation of the facts. Suffice it to say that the trial court has apparently failed to fully appreciate the import of our prior decisions.1 Upon examination of the record in this case and consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in not granting plaintiff specific performance and in failing to consider the award of damages. In order to further implement our prior decisions and based upon the facts in the record we are of the opinion that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sea Ledge Properties, Inc. v. DodgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Krantz v. DonnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Vietor v. SillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Vietor v. SillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chianese v. CulleyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API