Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dimery v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1975No. [No. 161, September Term, 1974.]Published

1Dissent

O’Donnell, J,

dissenting:

I regret that in this sordid and twice-tried case I must dissent from the conclusion reached by my learned brethren.

Just as under an indictment charging murder in the statutory form prescribed in Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol.) Art. 27, § 616, the jury has a right to return any one of five verdicts: (a) guilty of murder in the first degree, (b) guilty of murder in the first degree, “without capital punishment” (as provided in Art. 27, § 413), (c) guilty of murder in the second degree, (d) not guilty of murder, guilty of manslaughter 1 and (e) not guilty (Jones v.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API