Hamilton v. Herr
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to determine whether 11 U.S.C. § 524(a) makes a state-court judgment void ab initio when entered against a debtor whose dischargeable debts had been discharged, or whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine compels federal courts to respect the state-court judgment. We conclude that § 524(a) prevails and state court judgments that modify a discharge order are void ab initio.
Defendant-Appellant Alicia Hamilton Herr (“Herr”) appeals a district-court order reversing the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of Plaintiff-Appellee James Stewart…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Isaacs v. DBI-ASG Coinvestor Fund, III, LLC (In Re Isaacs)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- McMillan v. LTV Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Wohleber v. Skurko (In re Wohleber)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Mid-City Bank v. Skyline Woods Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Pazdzierz v. First American Title Insurance (In Re Pazdzierz)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.