Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Illinois Watch Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided January 4, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Royal E. Robbins and others against the Illinois Watch Company and others, to restrain an alleged infringement of certain patents.

1Opinion of the Court

Blodgett, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity, charging defendant with the infringement of reissued patent No. 10,631, issued to complainants Angustí, 1885, as assignees of original patent No. 280,709, granted to Duane H. Church July 3, 1883, for a “stem-winding watch, and patent No. 287,001, granted October 23,1883, to Caleb K. Colby, for an “improvement in stem-winding watch pendants,” and praying an *543injunction and accounting. Both these patents wore before this court, and eon.-idered in the lig'ht of the prior art as then shown, in Same Complainants v. Aurora Watch Co., 43 Fed. Rep.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Silver Peak Mines v. ValcaldaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  2. Robbins v. Illinois Watch Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API