Cecil Pond Construction Co. v. Ed Bell Investment, Inc.

RAMEY, Chief Justice.

This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury findings on two affirmative defenses to a conversion suit 1 . The Appellant, Cecil Pond Construction Company, (“Pond Construction”), sued Appellees, Ed Bell Investments, Inc. (“Bell Investments”) and Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) for Bell Investment’s taking the proceeds of certain checks owed to Pond Construction. The jury found that the defendants did redirect and appropriate checks belonging to Pond Construction, but that Pond Construction had both waived its right to certain of the…