Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Smoot
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 2004No. 53A01-0308-CV-314PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Plaintiff, Rosalind R. Bowman (Bowman), appeals from the trial court's denial of her Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 60(B).
We affirm.
ISSUE
Bowman raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred in denying her Motion for Relief from Judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In April of 1997, Bowman filed a complaint against Appellee-Defendant, Harold Smoot (Smoot), for alleged injuries arising from an automobile accident. In December of 2000, the trial court conducted a jury trial in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Owen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Indiana Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Freidline v. Civil City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Don H. Dumont, M.D. v. Penny Davis and Nicole Anderson, as Co-Administratrixes of the Estate of Charmitta JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013