Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
By motion for leave to file a bill of complaint, Ohio seeks to invoke this Court’s original jurisdiction. Because of the importance and unusual character of the issues tendered we set the matter for oral argument, inviting the Solicitor General to participate and to file a brief on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae. For reasons that follow we deny the motion for leave to file.
The action, for abatement of a nuisance, is brought on behalf of the State and its citizens, and names as defendants Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. (Wyandotte), Dow Chemical Co. (Dow America), and Dow Chemical…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.