Legal Opinion

People v. Andursky

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1925No. Docket No. 1261PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Respondent was charged and found guilty of the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed on or about the tenth day of November, 1924, upon Martha E. Biggs, a female of the age of fifteen years and not the wife of respondent. He was also charged in a second count of the information with the crime of violation of the Juvenile Court Law in the state of California, in that on or about the tenth day of November, 1924, he did cause, and tend to cause and encourage and induce, and endeavor to induce said Martha E. Biggs, a female of the age of fifteen years to perform such acts and to follow…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kuck v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. State v. AkersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Rosenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. PahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API