Legal Opinion
King County v. King County Hearing Examiner
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 2, 2006No. 57930-4-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
¶1 King County’s Wastewater Treatment Division of the Department of Natural Resources and Parks (Wastewater) began plans to build a wastewater treatment facility, and the project underwent environmental analysis under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. A citizens’ group has pursued administrative appeals of multiple environmental impact statements (EIS) that have been published over the course of this project. Earlier this year, Snohomish County issued a permit to begin construction of the facility and stated that adverse environmental impacts would be mitigated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Barnes v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Olympia v. Thurston County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- City of Olympia v. THURSTON COUNTY BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- County of Spokane v. Local 1553, American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leskovar v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- King County Department of Development & Environmental Services v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- King County v. DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Julia A. Barnett, V. Washington State Dept. Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- King County v. King County Hearing ExaminerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.