Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Paris

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Judge.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether an annexation proceeding instituted by a fourth class city pursuant to KRS 81.210 and 81.220 may be completed under the standards set forth in those statutes when, during the pendency of the annexation, the city is elevated to a third class city.

The annexation procedures for cities of the fourth class are materially different from those in third class cities, which are controlled by KRS 81.190, 81.100 and 81.110.

In both classes of cities the initial step is taken by the legislative body in passing an ordinance accurately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  2. Westwood Development Company v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. City of Covington v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Lebanon v. Goodin ex rel. GoodinKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. City of Jeffersontown v. City of HurstbourneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  3. Donald v. City of GlenviewCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API