Legal Opinion

United States v. Ettelson

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 21, 1946No. 1476PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

This action is brought under 26 U.S.C.A. Internal Revenue Code, § 3678, for the purpose of foreclosing a lien for income taxes alleged to exist in favor of the United States. The real estate involved is located in Green Lake County, Wisconsin, and formerly belonged to the late Samuel A. Ettelson, a resident of Chicago, Illinois.

Defendant Amy B. Ettelson is the widow of Samuel A. Ettelson. Defendant Leo J. Strauss is the son of Amy Ettelson. Defendant Frank G. Lueck is the holder of certain delinquent real estate tax certificates for the year 1939, purchased by him from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Investment & Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. United States v. PaisleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1938
  3. Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SaslavskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API