Legal Opinion
Werblud v. Werblud
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Milonas, J.
Plaintiff Maurice Werblud has commenced this action for an order pursuant to section 248 of the Domestic Relations Law relieving him from the necessity of paying alimony to defendant Elaine Werblud, his former wife, on the ground that she has been habitually living with another man and holding herself out as his wife or, in the alternative, seeking an order under Domestic Relations Law § 236 for a modification or elimination of his support obligations on the basis of a change in circumstances. Defendant has cross-moved for an order pursuant to Domestic Relations…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Merl v. MerlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bliss v. BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Northrup v. NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burn v. BurnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Burn v. BurnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012