Legal Opinion

Lederer v. Fox

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 8, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Tort. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Cottrell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Objection is made in behalf of the plaintiffs to the admission in evidence of certain leases, and the admission of evidence tending to show that employes of the landlord and of other tenants visited the various floors of the building. "We deem it unnecessary to dwell upon these objections. The questions involved in this case have been fully considered in Chicago Telephone Co. v. Com. Union Assurance Co., 131 Ill. App. 248. In that case it was “insisted that a tenant is liable to third persons for damages resulting from the defective condition of the premises of which he has notice, or from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago Telephone Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. of LondonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Oil Co. v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Martindale Clothing Co. v. Spokane & Eastern Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Miller v. McElinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  4. Midland Oil Co. v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API