Legal Opinion

Hobart Mfg. Co. v. Klosterman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton county reversing a judgmént in favor of the defendant rendered by the Municipal Court of Cincinnati.

' The action is in replevin. The plaintiff, appellee, based its title and right of possession upon a conditional sales contract. The defendant, appellant, claimed title and right of possession as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice from the conditional-sale vendee.

This controversy has resulted from an improper indexing of the conditional sales contract by the county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burris v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Inashima v. WardallWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API