Hobart Mfg. Co. v. Klosterman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton county reversing a judgmént in favor of the defendant rendered by the Municipal Court of Cincinnati.
' The action is in replevin. The plaintiff, appellee, based its title and right of possession upon a conditional sales contract. The defendant, appellant, claimed title and right of possession as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice from the conditional-sale vendee.
This controversy has resulted from an improper indexing of the conditional sales contract by the county…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burris v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Inashima v. WardallWashington Supreme Court · 1924