Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Flournoy
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 7, 1965No. 47656PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Eight persons, all residents and property taxpayers of Caddo Parish, instituted this suit against the ex officio tax collector of that parish,1 individually and in behalf of all taxpayers in Caddo Parish similarly situated. They prayed for recovery of the 1964 state ad valorem tax assessed under R.S. 47:1701, which they paid under protest, and for judgment declaring the tax to be unconstitutional, null, and void as applied to them and to all other persons in Caddo Parish similarly situated, and relieving them from all future payment of such tax. The defendant excepted,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dixon v. FlournoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965