Rite Aid Corp. v. Haywood
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentScudder, P.J.
I respectfully dissent. In my view, the valuation determination made by Supreme Court should be upheld, and I would therefore affirm the order and judgment. While it is well established that “a property valuation by the tax assessor is presumptively valid” (Matter of FMC Corp. [Peroxygen Chems. Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d 179, 187 [1998]), I agree with the majority that petitioner came forward with substantial evidence to rebut the presumption by submitting “a detailed, competent appraisal based on standard, accepted appraisal techniques and prepared by a qualified appraiser” (Matter of Niagara…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Assessor of Town of GeddesNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rite Aid v. Assessor of the Town of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Eckerd Corp. v. SemonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.