Wilt v. McCallum
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
The following opinion of Bland, J., as originally written,.is hereby adopted as the opinion of this court on rehearing, except as hereinafter stated. The original opinion inadvertently referred to the machine in question'as a “Wampler” machine, when the .correct name was “Wappler.” This error, however, is not material and in no way affects the conclusions reached. The opinion reads as follows:
This is a suit for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $6000 but voluntarily remitted the sum of $3000 from the judgment, resulting in a final judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- McGrath v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Casey v. Wrought Iron Bridge Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Klebe v. Parker Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Wells v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mournet v. SumnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Freche v. MaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Furlong v. StokesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.