Taefi v. Stevens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The facts are adequately stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Defendants contend that the Court of Appeals has incorrectly stated the rule for damages in a breach of contract for the sale of real estate. We do not agree. We have carefully reviewed the opinion of that court and the briefs and authorities relating to defendants’ contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the Court of Appeals, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct and adopt that opinion as our own with a single minor modification. After correctly quoting the rule stated in 77 Am.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- American Mechanical Corp. v. Union MacHine Co. of Lynn, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Chris v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Chris v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- EAST CAMP, LLC v. SpruillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009