Legal Opinion

Strahan v. Holmes

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 9, 2010No. Civil Action 07-10359-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In December, 2008, the Court presided over a bench trial to resolve a dispute between pro se plaintiff Richard Max Strahan (“Strahan”) and defendant Daniel Holmes (“Holmes”), a commercial lobster fisherman, with respect to the entanglement of a humpback whale. Strahan, who is now pursuing an appeal of this Court’s ruling in that case to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, has requested the trial transcript at government expense and an award of costs against the defendant. He has also re quested, at this belated hour, that the presiding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michael Alan Crooker v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. In the Matter of United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, MovantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  3. James W. Giannetta v. Peter A. BoucherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lech v. Von GoelerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
  2. White v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API