Legal Opinion

William K. Edmister and Elizabeth Edmister v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1968No. 17622_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

William K. Edmister and his wife, Elizabeth, petition this Court for review of a decision of the Tax Court whereby it was held that the transfer of certain real estate from Capital Elevator and Manufacturing Company to the petitioners was essentially equivalent to a dividend and the value thereof taxable as ordinary income. The facts are not disputed and are fully stated in the finding of facts and opinion of the Tax Court reported at 46 T.C. 651.

In 1961 and for some time prior thereto the capital stock of Capital Elevator and Manufacturing Company (the corporation) was owned as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Anna I. Woodworth v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Charles P. Ballenger, Jr., and Myrtle S. Ballenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. John M. Wiseman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jason L. Honigman and Edith Honigman, Petitioners-Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. DeTreville v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  5. United States v. Otto AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API