Legal Opinion
Ming Dai v. William P. Barr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2019No. 15-70776PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MING DAI, No. 15-70776 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A205-555-836 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent. Filed October 22, 2019 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Circuit Judge, and Stephen S. Trott and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. Order; Statement Respecting Denial by Judge Trott; Dissent by Judge Callahan; Statement Respecting Denial by Judges O’Scannlain and Trott; Dissent by Judge Collins 2 DAI V. SESSIONS SUMMARY* Immigration The panel denied a petition for rehearing en banc on behalf of the court. Dissenting…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Aden v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garland v. Ming DaiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Garland v. Ming DaiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Garland v. Ming DaiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021