Commonwealth v. Bayne
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 21, April T., 1919, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Mercer Co., April T., 1917, No. 89, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Jake Bayne.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
The-defendant was indicted for selling liquor without a license. The proceedings in the court below were similar to those had in the case of the Commonwealth v. Jacobson, and are recited in the opinion this day filed in that case. The principles involved have been fully discussed in the case of the Commonwealth v. Jacobson, and it is not necessary to elaborate upon what we there said: This defendant was an agent of Jacobson and in that capacity made a large number of contracts with citizens of the Borough of Farrell in the County of Mercer for the *45sale of liquors and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. HullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917