Legal Opinion

J.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 1995No. 95-382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

No recording of the trial in this case is available because of a malfunction in the recording equipment. The trial court has entered an order finding that the parties are unable to agree on the events at trial and certifies that the record cannot be reconstructed. Appellant moves to vacate his conviction. The state concedes that remand for a new trial is the appropriate remedy.

The granting of a new trial is the proper remedy when an adequate record cannot be prepared. Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462 (Fla.1977). This principle has been deemed applicable to juvenile cases. M.R.G. v. State, 576…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delap v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. M.R.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. D.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. J.R.V. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API