Legal Opinion
Seymour v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 9, 1999No. 98-03919PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
738 So.2d 984 (1999)
Michael SEYMOUR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-03919.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 9, 1999.
Gerald A. Perez, Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Michael Seymour appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to dismiss based on a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.[1] After the trial court denied him dismissal, he pleaded no contest, reserving his right to appeal the speedy trial issue. We…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Howell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- The Florida Bar v. CorbinSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- State v. RoundtreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gamble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Niles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Doyle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014