Legal Opinion

Hays v. Ford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

At the June term, 1867, James Moor-man recovered a judgment, on a promissory note, in the Randolph Circuit Court, in this State, against the appellant, Hays, Henry Jacobs, Benjamin S. Evans, John Lindsey, Philip Barger, Robert B. Cowgill and John A. J ones, for the sum of two thousand and nineteen dollars and thirty-three cents, and costs, in which judgment said Jacobs, Evans and Lindsey were principals, and said appellant, Barger, Cowgill and Jones were sureties.

*54On the 28th of October, 1867, Barger, Cowgill and Jones paid the judgment to Moorman.

On the 8th day of September, 1868, appellant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Tobias v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Ruckman v. . CowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  5. Dunn v. SparksIndiana Supreme Court · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Werz v. WerzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. First Nat. Bank of Goodland v. PothuisjeIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In re Columbia Real-Estate Co.District Court, D. Indiana · 1900
  5. Wiley v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API