Baker v. Lord
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, C. J.
The issue in this case is whether an owner-passenger in an automobile is barred from recovery against the driver by the doctrine of imputed negligence. We hold that there is no such bar.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from an automobile accident which occurred in July 1966. The plaintiff was the owner of the vehicle in which she was riding as a passenger and which was being driven by the defendant. Prior to trial the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff, being the owner and present in the vehicle,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Cooper v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Howe v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Alderman v. NobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consolidated Utility Equipment Services, Inc. v. Emhart Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Mitchell v. RepucciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986