Legal Opinion

Bamberger v. Morris

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 26, 1932Published

1Per curiam

Since the corpus of the trust consists of personal property, its purpose could not be accomplished until the trustees had performed their duty to divide and distribute that property among the beneficiaries. The duty to divide and distribute included as a necessary and incidental power the right to receive payment and to collect outstanding choses in action. The trustees, therefore, could maintain this action as the real parties in interest. (Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Pendleton, 115 App. Div. 506; Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Hamersley, 210 id. 57; affd., 240 N. Y. 558.) The notations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. PendletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Bank of New York and Trust Company v. HamersleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API