Legal Opinion

People v. Percy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1975PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*808Noting that the People were granted leave both in County Court and at the Appellate Division to resubmit the charges to another Grand Jury, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division. In so doing we also express our agreement with the views expressed in that opinion with respect to the disposition of a motion to dismiss an indictment under CPL 210.35 (subd 5) for failure to have recorded the instructions to the Grand Jury in accordance with the mandate of CPL 190.25 (subd 6). Here…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. People v. KaminskyNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. ErcegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. In re Reports of Nassau County Grand Jury for April 1975 Term, New York County Courts1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API