Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leavitt v. Bell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1898No. 7960Published

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county Heard below before Keysob, J.

1Dissent

Irvine, 0.,

dissenting.

I cannot concur in the opinion of the court in so far as it holds that a petition by the owners of abutting property is essential to confer power on the council to order the paving of an improvement district. The cases of Von Steen v. City of Beatrice, 36 Neb. 421, and State v. Birkhauser, 37 Neb. 521, are, it is true,, authority for that construction of the statute, but those eases were based entirely on an interpretation of the section of the charter involved as if it had beén drawn and enacted as an entirety and at a given moment. The history of the law’’ has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Von Steen v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State ex rel. City of Omaha v. BirkhauserNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API