Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Balcone

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 12, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The various objections filed by the next of kin are disposed of in accordance with the rulings of the surrogate upon the trial, excepting those upon which decision was reserved.

The remaining objections cover (1) the proper computation of commissions which will be determined upon the settlement of the decree.(2) I hold that the evidence establishes that Carmela Izzo De Sapio, Beniamino Izzo and Giuseppe Izzo are the persons legally entitled to take by intestacy the estate of the decedent (Former section 98, subdivision 16, Decedent Estate Law, in effect at the date of death of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Darling v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rushworth v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API