Legal Opinion

Sorbino v. New Brunswick

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 4, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 N.J. Super. 554 (1957)

129 A.2d 473

LAWRENCE SORBINO, ALGONQUIN REALTY CO., A CORPORATION, SAMUEL COHN AND F.S.F. REALTY CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J., A MUNICIPAL AGENCY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 4, 1957.

Messrs. Hannoch, Weinstein, Myers & Stern and Mr. Jacques S. Lederman, attorneys for plaintiffs.

Mr. Samuel D. Hoffman and Mr. Frederick F. Richardson, attorneys…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. City of Houston v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Stahl v. Paterson Bd. of FinanceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Weehawken Env. Committee, Inc. v. Tp. WeehawkenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API