Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Teamsters Local 250
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 2010No. 1116 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (Commission), petitions for review from an Arbitration Award dated May 6, 2009 (Award), which sustained grievances filed by Teamsters, Local Union No. 250 (Local 250) on behalf of grievants Alex Lugin (Lugin) and Ken Fowler (Fowler) (Collectively, Grievants), and found that the Commission violated the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) by utilizing supplemental employees outside the scope of the permissible reasons contained in Article 1, Section 3.E of the CBA, and determined that the “Commission must make the grievants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State System of Higher Education v. State College University Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Westmoreland Intermediate Unit 7 v. Westmoreland Intermediate Unit 7 Classroom Assistants Educational Support Personnel Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n v. Appalachia Intermediate Unit 08Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Midland Borough School District v. Midland Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Teamsters Local Union No. 250Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pa. State Sys. of Higher Educ. v. Ass'n of Pa. State Coll. & Univ. FacultiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Department of Corrections v. Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Department of Corrections v. Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Snyder County Prison v. Teamsters Local Union 764Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014