Legal Opinion

Miller Milling Co. v. Amyett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1966No. 5-3885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is á claim under the workmen’s compensation law for medical expenses and temporary disability resulting from a hernia assertedly suffered by the appellee in the course of his employment. The Commission, with one member dissenting, held the injury to be compensable. The circuit court affirmed that decision.

The pivotal question is whether there is any substantial evidence to establish the fifth of the five specific facts that our statute requires in hernia cases. This is the pertinent language of the statute:

“In all cases of claims for hernia it shall he shown to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prince Poultry Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cagle Fabricating & Steel, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Harkleroad v. CotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Lashlee Steel Co. v. DodridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Haygood v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API